Showing posts with label jesse eisenberg. Show all posts
Showing posts with label jesse eisenberg. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 6, 2015

Top 25 Films of 2014

We’ve got a lot of words below, so I will keep this short. Yes, 2014 was a great year for movies, and if you don’t think so I invite you to catch up with some of the selections below. Or better yet, harass me online or in person as to what I got wrong. A lesson I have come to terms with this year is that cinema only flourishes when faced with passionate, well-argued criticism.

In 2014, I found a lot of it at the well-respected venues (Kent Jones’ history of auteurism at Film Comment, Richard Brody on National Gallery at The New Yorker, the New York Times’ Manohla Dargis on the year in film) as well as at Letterboxd, a Goodreads-like movie database/community that has become pretty much an addiction of mine. The site encourages you to file short reviews for each film you log as seeing, which for me has not only honed my writing but changed the way I think and watch. It’s all for the better, I’d say, though after you skim through/slowly savor the list below I invite you to browse my profile and make that judgment yourself.

And one last thing about Letterboxd: it tallies how many films you see. The damage for 2014? 411, and only 130 of those were movies released this year. “Only," ha.

Anyway, here are my picks for the year’s best, with links to my original reviews and Netflix when applicable:

1/25/15 EDIT: After second viewing, Boyhood promoted from #6 to #3


1. The Immigrant
It is disingenuous for a critic to set rules for what constitutes greatness, since masterworks, by nature, surprise and redefine their medium’s potential, at least in the minds of those enraptured by such works. But I found have found one constant across the films I consider the best, and that is something I would call the “Vertigo effect.” Contrary to debilitating dizziness, this feeling overwhelms me at various points (including, almost always, the ends) of great, great films, of which I use Hitchcock’s Vertigo as just about an unbeatable yardstick.

This feeling is a vast, complicated one, not necessarily sad but definitely incompatible with happiness. It is the feeling of knowledge, summated and rendered ineffable, departed from one fallen soul to another and yearning to converse without the burden of circuitous language. It is both a transcendent feeling and one rooted in the earth, for it is only through sounds and images that these films give form to poetry. It is a feeling of collapsed time and palpable history. It is a feeling multitudinous and impossible to do written justice, for it exists only in the medium of its making and even then, just barely.

The Immigrant, as is obvious by now, left me with such a feeling. It tells a simple story, of one woman spurned and coerced into prostitution by a covetous pimp (Joaquin Phoenix, perfect), a story far from new. Many character actions come and go without clarification, and much of the time our protagonist, Ewa (Marion Cotillard, also perfect), drifts by in a haze of reluctance and indecision.

But writer-director James Gray, with a touch of the sacred from Darius Khondji’s photography and Chris Spelman’s music, never allows Ewa to suffer for suffering’s sake. She always has an eye on meaning, self-worth and agency — in a word, the future, and how to make it hers. If the film leaves you with a heavy feeling, as described above, that feeling also emanates from two final acts of compassion, which together constitute progress. Progress may be antithetical to loss, but so rarely does art convey, with a clarity that transcends polemics and approaches gospel, how one cannot arrive without the other.  (My review) (On Netflix!)

2. The Grand Budapest Hotel
The Grand Budapest Hotel is at once Wes Anderson’s most challenging work and his most fast-paced and farcical. Which means there is a dissonance at its heart that most will overlook, not necessarily out of ignorance but incompetence. Lest that sound like me, the arrogant elitist, casting shade on the groundlings, know that I’ll readily admit to my inability to keep up with the speed of Grand Budapest’s invention, which manifests through shifts in color, intrusions of artifice (miniatures, key lights turning on, Gustave lecturing to the camera, etc.) and skips across time and aspect ratios. It might just be too fun to engage with “properly,” i.e. to discern its nuances from a distance.

All the more reason to watch it over and over. I’ve seen this film three times now, twice in theaters, and none of the jokes, which depend on framing (see above, and David Bordwell's essential essay here), sound (see here) and deep space (“She’s been murdered, and you think I did it.”) as much as words, have staled. It is truly an excellent piece of entertainment, in league with such obvious influences as The Grand Illusion and To Be or Not to Be. And like those classics, there is so much more going on under the surface than one viewing might be able to discern.

Most recently, I’ve been chewing on the idea that Gustave’s cultivated, decadent world not only “vanished before he ever entered it,” as Mr. Moustafa’s last lines conclude, but never existed at all. The constant, jarring reminders that this film is founded on artifice dislodge it from any historical reality, even as it makes unmistakable gestures to WWII. Anderon’s camera quickly surveys the hotel’s interiors yet leaves us with a near-complete image of every chamber, bath and staircase, including where and how they all relate to one another. Picture the concierge desk, with Zero behind it and Jason Schwartzmann later, and it will come to mind as a real place, one decaying across decades, if not in our memories. It is Wes Anderon’s humility that makes us long for a time we swear we could touch, even when it’s nothing more than his creation.




3. Boyhood
As easy to love as to hate, Boyhood has attracted and sustained so animated a discussion because of its perceived “relatability.” Some see themselves in Mason Jr.’s every milestone and indecision, while others resent that the all-encompassing sweep of the title points to yet another white boy from Texas. Both takes are correct, but what else is there in Boyhood? Its main subject, more than Mason, turns out to be time, and how it shapes who we are by virtue of its passing alone — doesn’t matter if you change for the better or keep making the same mistakes, because you’ll always be defined by your past. The film responds by moving ever forward, to the point where the story merely stops rather than ends. Past and future are palpable specters in Boyhood, pinned loosely by the enrapturing present of watching them all collide at once. (My review)


4. Manakamana
I am not being facetious when I say that Manakamana is one of most thrilling films of the year. It is two hours long and composed of 11 shots, each of which studies, in contemplative stillness, the occupants of a cable car gliding to and from the titular Nepalese temple. Most of those occupants are humans, though you spend one 11-minute stretch staring at goats, whose initial cuteness subsides once your mind wanders to their reason for inclusion, viz. their role in Hindu ceremony.

Your mind will wander a good deal, which is not a symptom of boredom but engagement. Blown up on a cinema screen, these men, women, children and, yes, bovids offer but a fraction of their lives for the camera, and the mystery of what transpired before and what will after takes on a most pressing importance. This introduces matters of modernization, representation and cultural relativism, all of which directors Stephanie Spray and Pacho Velez (affiliates of Harvard’s Sensory Ethnography Lab, the breeding ground of such other adventurous documentaries as Leviathan and People’s Park), have in mind. But beyond theory and beyond words, Manakamana makes palpable the beauty of human connection, through the creation of art (as during that transcendent passage seen above) and the very act of existing in time and space. (On Netflix, with a hilariously low average star rating)

5. Inherent Vice
Where There Will Be Blood told the story of one man in monstrous control of his environment, Inherent Vice tells what can only loosely be defined as a story of one man, Doc Sportello (Joaquin Phoenix), completely overwhelmed by his. Between these two Paul Thomas Anderson films lies the gap between modernism and postmodernism, Great Men and everyone else, capitalism and whatever comes next. From the erratic appearances of Doc’s ex, Shasta Hepworth (Katherine Waterston), to the ever-shifting “Golden Fang,” which takes on forms insidious and innocuous, the elements of Inherent Vice contradict and confound, as you might expect of a Thomas Pynchon adaptation.

This not just narrative but tonal and thematic murkiness has led to downright hostile reactions from some, but there are two reasons I believe this to be a great film: First of all, it is hilarious, pretty much non-stop for the first hour. You got Joaquin shuddering at doors slamming behind him and white nuclear families running drugs and Josh Brolin blowing a frozen banana in the out-of-focus foreground of a minute-long shot. This is endearingly bizarre and very formally precise comedy that feeds into what I believe to be the film’s primary mission: to make strange, and thus apparent, the corruption, hypocrisies and queasy power structures of American society.

This Anderson and D.P. Robert Elswit do through filmic, undoubtedly sober images, which constitute my second reason. Inherent Vice is a weird movie but not a surrealist one, for it uses the indexical, this-is-reality properties of the cinematic image to see its subjects anew. The world is screwed up enough without it needing to be filtered through and conflated with a dream, basically. If approached in such a manner, that Anderson and Pynchon are not just out to “mindfuck” you, then not only will you enjoy Inherent Vice but you may learn something from it too. It’s just that those lessons happen to indict the systems of meaning and value most of us take for granted. Funny, isn’t it?

6. John Wick
Coming to terms with John Wick’s greatness requires a few concessions. One: Keanu is preternaturally good at what he does and I feel that’s a truth we don’t bow to enough. Two: Cinema is such an audiovisual medium that a mediocre script, as in John Wick’s case, does not preclude but actually facilitates greatness — that is, if the directors are game. Chad Stahelski and David Leitch, veteran stuntmen but first-time auteurs, most certainly are, crafting thrills, laughs and uncannily beautiful moments out of choreography, color, camera movement, music cues and precisely timed pauses. Three: Subtext means nil if it does not spring out of a vital, vibrant piece of art, and once in a rare while that art can also front as a dumb action movie and be easily, blissfully enjoyed as such. (My review)

7. Two Days, One Night
A moving and riveting act of witness, Two Days, One Night strikes the perfect balance between politics and character study as it follows one factory worker, Sandra (Marion Cotillard), who must convince her colleagues to forfeit their €1000 bonus so that she may keep her job. Her scramble for votes finds form in a deliberate, door-to-door structure, which would be stiff and overly schematic if not for Cotillard’s ability to register each victory or setback with a shift in gait, a return inward or unspooling out, a raising or quieting of the voice also dependent on the outcomes before. By condensing her struggle into a thriller-like race against time, the Dardennes push Sandra out of depression and into action, into the hands of those who may ignore her pleas but must at least look into her eyes as they do so. It all builds to one of the least sentimental triumphs of optimism in art cinema history, filled with grace and will and hope for the unknowable future.


8. National Gallery
“Sublime” is somehow a word both archaic and overused, but it is apt to describe and praise Frederick Wiseman’s latest. On paper a cinematic tour of London’s prestigious art museum, National Gallery builds to something far more limitless and mysteriously affecting by the time its final frame cuts to black. It takes three hours to get to that point, and in trademark Wiseman fashion no protagonist or clear-cut goal carries the narrative. In fact, this documentary is looser and quieter than his last film, the four-hour masterpiece At Berkeley.

But it’s anything but boring, considering how Wiseman’s camera observes the museum’s brilliant docents, restoration facilities and stringent director, Nicholas Penny, whose frank, borderline contemptuous impatience with some of his colleagues affirms, once again, Wiseman’s unsung talent at capturing the often heated climate of the workplace. As educational and even funny it may be moment-to-moment, this film glides with a kind of unpretentious majesty, through history and through all the mediums of art, from painting and music to dance and discourse. It left me stunned yet empowered, as if I came upon a banquet with every great Western artist in attendance and Rembrandt caught my eye and pulled out the empty stool between him and Holbein.


9. Under the Skin
As cold and cruel a vision you will ever see, as well as one of the most vibrant, Under the Skin is a lot of movie. The events as they occur are legible enough, but some of them exact an emotional toll (particularly a scene on a beach and its nocturnal follow-up) so traumatizing to throw the narrative and its larger ‘point,’ or at least your perception of these things, into disarray. Which is, itself, one of the movie’s points: to distance you from Scarlett Johansson’s protagonist to such an extreme so that you become aware of your own affect, and how affect is perhaps the key tenet to being human.

The film’s second half brings Scarlett down to earth, as it were, and introduces such human qualities as emotion and sensuality (as opposed to just sex) into her bloodstream. But with morality comes vulnerability, which is especially strong when you’re a woman who looks like Scarlett. The terror at the end confirms the feminist undercurrent that will have been so obvious for some since Scarlett’s entrance and, in turn, contextualizes the film’s dispassionate violence. There is indeed a point to Under the Skin, many of them, but with Jonathan Glazer’s visuals, Mica Levi’s score and Scarlett’s ultimate femme fatale rumbling at the surface, there comes a point where the mystery becomes more enticing, and distressing, than any of the assemblages of words that could solve it.


10. Selma
I don’t need to tell you how Selma is an indisputably, unbelievably relevant film. That it takes place 50 years in the past makes this fact all the more alarming, but again, this you know. What I can tell you is that Ava DuVarney’s Selma is just about a miracle of filmmaking intelligence, the awards-hungry biopic premise executed with poise, perspective and artistic panache. Sure, you’ll have no choice but to stump for Best Actor hopeful David Oyelowo, who does justice to Martin Luther King Jr.’s legacy by foregrounding the unknowable bustle of his inner life, or Best Supporting Actress contender Carmen Ejogo, who not only is a dead ringer for Coretta Scott but makes flesh her strength and compassion. There are innumerable obvious assets in Selma’s favor, but I have a feeling it won’t vanish in a few months time because it was all flash, no truth, as is the case with its competitive peers.

Like Lincoln, Selma pays very close attention to political procedure, and how it forms those who hack through it as much as the other way around. The ideology that is spoken hews closer to moral philosophy, and some of the most moving passages turn to God (like after the second Selma bridge impasse) or his earthbound translators (Martin’s phone call with Mahalia Jackson). Meanwhile, during the traumatic “Bloody Sunday” reenactment, the crack of the lash from a horse-riding policeman to a fleeing protestor’s back not only drives home the act’s cruelty but sends the waves of history crashing down on you in the theater, a witness to violence spanning eons.

Selma feels so uncommonly wise because it’s not about a historical moment or the idea that fuels that moment (justice!), but how only through the conflict between embroiled motivations and coolheaded tactics do those moments appear. A great man once said, “The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice,” and the brilliance of Selma is how it embodies that “universe” more than any other word.


11. Mr. Turner
Selma excepted, Mr. Turner is my ideal of a biopic: a mosaic of non-events, scenic rambles and moral contradictions without a three-act structure leading it all any one place. This will frustrate those who hope to learn about Turner's technique, or what hardships he so valiantly had to overcome, or why his art ‘matters.’ The first and last time we see J.M.W. Turner, he is sketching outdoors in silhouette, bookends to remind us not only of Dick Pope's gifts but how the alchemy of genius cannot be explained by language, filmic or otherwise. Which is all to say the portrait this film interprets out of the relatively calm life of J.M.W. Turner is incredibly complex, hinting at his disgust for pollution, violence and bourgeois custom as motivations for his art and demeanor while depicting his casual cruelty without apology. If the film lacks thematic through lines, it more than makes up by lining each scene with a quiet yet universal revelation. (Excerpted from a longer review here)

12. Force Majeure
The only movie on this list, the only movie this year, that feels like it should have a Janus Films logo at its start, for better or worse. The “worse” parts, for me, are actually among Force Majeure’s assets: Its modernist trappings, and embedded critique, evoke Tati and Antonioni more than those of contemporary cinema’s groundbreaking artists; its husband-wife sparring owes a great deal to Bergman, who is out of fashion in critical circles today but who I adore nonetheless; and its ambiguous, literally foggy ending echoes Fellini, if not the Neorealists.

Which is all to say that if Force Majeure is not the year’s most original film, it is also one of its most splendidly argued, excoriating gender roles through meticulous frames that also allow space for passion, humor and bug-eyed delirium. I submit the shot where Mats and Tomas sit on pool chairs, fumbling with girls, beers and their own bodies, as the answer to the leading question in A.O. Scott’s much-read essay: “Who or what killed adulthood?” (My review)


13. Bird People
It’s safe to say nothing can prepare you for this, which, for once, does not portend a ghastly Michael Haneke or Gaspar Noé nightmare but a hopeful, winsome story of freedom. I’d advise you go in cold with Pascale Ferran’s latest, but do know that alongside its romantic pleasures, this film interrogates the inhuman efficacy of working class labor, the privilege of the jet set exploiting them and technology’s effect on the flesh-and-blood relationships relating to both parties.


14. Stranger by the Lake
"I'm gonna soak up the sun
Before it goes out on me
Don't have no master suite
I'm still the king of me
You have a fancy ride, but baby
I'm the one who has the key
Every time I turn around
I'm looking up, you're looking down
Maybe something's wrong with you
That makes you act the way you do
Maybe I am crazy too"
—Sheryl Crow


15. Snowpiercer
The sushi to Marvel’s roach bars, Snowpiercer is a blockbuster about many things — inequality, revolution, father-son relationships, shoes — that dares to be funny, heartbreaking and weird. That Bong Joon-ho covers a wide tonal spectrum should come as no surprise to anyone who has seen The Host or Mother, two of the most inexplicable yet oddly affecting genre films of the last decade. Bong knows an audience, regardless of taste, wants to feel something from a movie, and so he tunes every moment for maximum impact. It’s a post-apocalyptic movie where the weight of each human life impresses upon you even as Bong throws so many away, one by one.  (My review) (On Netflix)


16. The Tale of Princess Kaguya
It’s nice, every now and then, to watch a movie that totally wrecks you and remember that you have a soul.


17. Goodbye to Language
I need another go at Godard’s latest to see if my reserved admiration can blossom into full-on love. There’s a good chance it will, since I will not make the same mistake of expecting a narrative to cohere and order its pleasures. For the pleasures here are gloriously formal: the heart-sinking twirl of Gia Kancheli’s “Abii Ne Viderem”; the frizzled outline of Roxy Miéville, Godard’s exceptionally cheery hound; the z-axis distance between fingers curled around a gate and the woman those fingers belong to, gazing off somewhere else. It is insufficient to say that every shot is beautiful because shots do not exist adjacent to one another in Goodbye to Language. Images not only superimpose upon another — they fill different eyes, due to Godard's deconstruction of 3D's left-right polarity, at the same time. This is interactive cinema that needs to be picked up by a Kiarostami or Weerasethakul, but no one will forget the confounding thrill of watching Godard master it first.


18. The LEGO Movie
“All I'm asking for is total perfection.” (My review)


19. The Last of the Unjust
Everything about this movie, from its title to its length (three hours, 40 minutes) to its subject (the Holocaust), screams a pretty miserable time at the movies. But a good two hours of The Last of the Unjust fly by, in the company of Benjamin Murmelstein, the last Jewish Elder of Theresienstadt ghetto. Interviewed by Claude Lanzmann in 1975, he defends his controversial spot in Jewish history, and how his impossible task was to “accomplish something without having any power.” Lanzmann neither vindicates nor condemns him but lets him speak, and an engaging, jowly presence he is. Juxtaposing Murmelstein’s testimony with tours of Theresienstadt’s relics today, Lanzmann stresses language’s failure to unlock the Shoah and yet our incessant need to try. (My review)


20. American Sniper
I did my patriotic duty with this film right here, which I, naturally, invite you to read. The film is not some rah-rah “U.S.A.!” piece, but the story of one brutally efficient soldier, stripped of all moralizing. What you take from it will depend on your view of a soldier killing another soldier — not war, which is played by politicians — as a “necessary evil.” Simply “necessary” and thus incapable of being “evil,” or vice versa? You and I lean one way or the other in our individual interpretations of the phrase, but American Sniper sits right at the middle, proposing an unholy equilibrium between the two. No film this year demands or deserves a moral grappling so much as this one.


21. Lucy
Yes, Lucy is actually amazing and, yes, I also included Lucy on this list to piss off the haters, who must be punished until the end of time. Lucy will be waiting for them there. (My review)

22. Venus in Fur
Roman Polanski’s answer to that three-word, one-star review of Certified Copy on Netflix: “needs more BDSM.” This two-hander sees narrative progress as razing gender binaries and yet, somehow, none of my friends have heard of it. Cinema is still the new cinema! Watch this! (My review) (On Netflix)


23. The Strange Little Cat
If you have ever leaned against the wall of your narrow apartment hallway, and your relatives suddenly poured in through the door in front of you, and your dad called from the other room asking you to greet them, and the old familiar voices drowned out each other, and the dog couldn’t stop barking, and the chop-screech-chopping of carrots in the kitchen somehow grew louder over this bedlam, and you remained pinned there to the wall, in hell but wearing a smile, then rest assured that The Strange Little Cat knows you.


24. Night Moves
The movie where Mark Zuckerberg relapses back to his previous life, Norman Bates, and all hell breaks loose. A sensuous slow-burn, which I enjoyed wallowing in more than Only Lovers Left Alive and other protracted, nocturnal affairs, Night Moves sees Jesse Eisenberg weaponize his introversion to a chilling and finally devastating degree. The great Kelly Reichert catches some of the creepiest angles, from afar and up suffocatingly close, of this young star and another, Dakota Fanning, that this world will ever have the privilege to see. Eisenberg’s environmental terrorist is the embodiment of psycho male creepiness today, the weirdo who would torture you with dental tools and not even have the courtesy to ask, “Is it safe?” (My review)


25. Non-Stop
I think we can all agree this is really the best film of the year. (My review)

How About 10 More, This Time in Alphabetical Order:
Beyond the Lights
Coherence
Edge of Tomorrow
Foxcatcher
Listen Up Philip
Love Is Strange
A Most Wanted Man
Nightcrawler
The Trip to Italy (My review)
Wild (My review)

The Actors:

Best Lead Female Performance: Marion Cotillard, Two Days, One Night and The Immigrant
Six Other Great Ones: Julianne Moore, Still Alice; Essie Davis, The Babadook; Gugu Mbatha-Raw, Belle and Beyond the Lights; Lisa Loven Kongsli, Force Majeure; Reese Witherspoon, Wild; Scarlett Johansson, Under the Skin

Best Lead Male Performance: Timothy Spall, Mr. Turner
Six Other Great Ones: Joaquin Phoenix, The Immigrant and Inherent Vice; Ralph Fiennes, Grand Budapest Hotel; David Oyelowo, Selma; Philip Seymour Hoffman, A Most Wanted Man; Jake Gyllenhaal, Nightcrawler; Jesse Eisenberg, Night Moves

Best Supporting Actress: Tilda Swinton, Snowpiercer
Five Other Great Ones: Carmen Ejogo, Selma; Patricia Arquette, Boyhood; Julianne Moore, Maps to the Stars; Kim Dickens, Gone Girl; Melisa Sözen, Winter Sleep

Best Supporting Actor: Josh Brolin, Inherent Vice
Five Other Great Ones: Rob Brydon, The Trip to Italy; Mark Ruffalo, Foxcatcher; Ethan Hawke, Boyhood; Tyler Perry, Gone Girl; J.K. Simmons, Whiplash

Other Random Superlatives:

Five Amazing Non-Narrative Non-Features: Glistening Thrills (dir. Jodie Mack); Never Catch Me (dir. Hiro Murai); Too Many Cooks (dir. Casper Kelly); Transformers: The Premake (dir. Kevin B. Lee); Pizza Freaks Unite (dir. Tim & Eric)

Best Soundtracks: Under the Skin, Gone Girl, Inherent Vice

Gotta Throw in a Good Word For: Still Alice

I Actually Really Enjoyed: Need for Speed, Hercules, Pompeii, new Hobbit, Oculus

The Ten Greatest Older Movies I Saw for the First Time in 2014 (see a list of 50 here):

  1. Certified Copy (2011, dir. Abbas Kiarostami)
  2. My Darling Clementine (1946, dir. John Ford)
  3. The Birds (1963, dir. Alfred Hitchcock)
  4. The Shop Around the Corner (1940, dir. Ernst Lubitsch)
  5. Tropical Malady (2004, dir. Apichatpong Weerasekathul)
  6. Playtime (1967, dir. Jacques Tati)
  7. The Long Day Closes (1992, dir. Terence Davies)
  8. Trouble in Paradise (1932, dir. Ernst Lubitsch)
  9. Stop Making Sense (1984, dir. Jonathan Demme)
  10. Sherlock Jr. (1924, dir. Buster Keaton)

Most Revelatory Rewatches: Vertigo (1958, dir. Alfred Hitchcock), Mulholland Dr. (2001, dir. David Lynch), The Texas Chainsaw Massacre (1974, dir. Tobe Hooper)

Best Film Book I Read This Year: Films and Feelings by Raymond Durgnat

Worst Films: A Million Ways to Die in the West, A Field in England, Sin City: A Dame to Kill For

Potentially Great Movie Ruined by General Fatigue and the Noxious Perfume Emanating from the Woman Sitting Next to Me at the Film Forum: Leviathan

I Bought This Acclaimed 2013/2014 Movie on Blu-ray But It’s Not Gonna Arrive Until Like February: Stray Dogs

Limited Release Movies I Regret Not Yet Seeing But, Honestly, There’s Only So Many Times I Can Bus in From New Jersey — That Is, When I’m Actually in Jersey and Not Upstate, as Is the Case for Eight Months of the Year — And See What May Be Less Than a Slam Dunk (in order of decreasing regret): Closed Curtain, Actress, What Now? Remind Me, The Overnighters, Miss Julie, Concerning Violence, Beloved Sisters, Story of My Death, The Blue Room, Jimmy P., Life of Riley, Tales of the Grim Sleeper, Vic + Flo Saw a Bear, The Vanquishing of the Witch Baby Yaga, See You Next Tuesday

Well-Received 2014 Festival Releases That Won’t Open Until 2015 (Or At Least I Think): The Iron Ministry, The Duke of Burgundy, Clouds of Sils Maria, Jauja, Respire, Hard to Be a God, Kumiko the Treasure Hunter, The Princess of France, Mommy, Timbuktu, The Look of Silence, A Pigeon Sat on a Branch Reflecting on Existence

The 130 Movies Released in 2014 That I Saw This Year (with hyperlinks to my original reviews, bolded if they are full length):
Abuse of Weakness; The Amazing Spider-Man 2; American Sniper; The Babadook; Belle; Beyond the Lights; Birdman; Bird People; Blue Ruin; Borgman; Boyhood; Calvary; Captain America: The Winter Soldier; Citizenfour; Coherence; Dawn of the Planetof the Apes; Dear White People; The Double; Dumb and Dumber To; Edge of Tomorrow; Enemy; Exhibition; The Expendables 3; A Field in England; Force Majeure; Foxcatcher; Frank; Fury; Get on Up; A Girl Walks Home Alone at Night; Godzilla; Gone Girl; Goodbye to Language; The Grand Budapest Hotel; Guardians of the Galaxy; The Guest; Hercules; The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies; The Homesman; How to Train Your Dragon 2; The Hunger Games: Mockingjay — Part 1; Ida*; The Imitation Game; The Immigrant; Inherent Vice; Interstellar; The Interview; It Felt Like Love; Jack Ryan: Shadow Recruit; Jealousy; Jersey Boys; Joe; John Wick; Land Ho!; Last Days in Vietnam; The Last of the Unjust; The Lego Movie; Leviathan; Life Itself; Like Father, Like Son; Listen Up Philip; Locke; Love Is Strange; Lucy; Magic in the Moonlight; Maleficent; Manakamana; Maps to the Stars; The MazeRunner; A Million Ways to Die in the West; The Missing Picture; A Most Wanted Man; Mr. Turner; Muppets Most Wanted; National Gallery; Need for Speed; Neighbors; Nightcrawler; Night Moves; Noah; Non-Stop; Norte, the End of History; Nymphomaniac; Obvious Child; Oculus; The One I Love; Only Lovers Left Alive; Palo Alto; Particle Fever; Pompeii; Proxy; The Purge: Anarchy; The Raid 2; Rosewater; The Rover; Sabotage; Selma; Sin City: A Dame to Kill For; The Skeleton Twins; Snowpiercer; A Spell to Ward Off the Darkness; Starred Up; Still Alice; Stranger by the Lake; The Strange Colour of Your Body’s Tears; The Strange Little Cat; The Tale of Princess Kaguya; The Theory ofEverything; The Trip to Italy; 22 Jump Street; Two Faces of January; They Came Together; Thou Wast Mild and Lovely; Top Five; Tracks; Transcendence; Transformers: Age of Extinction; Two Days, One Night; Under the Skin; The Unknown Known; Venus in Fur; A Walk Among the Tombstones; We Are the Best!; Welcome to New York; Whiplash; Why Don’t You Play in Hell?; Wild; The Wind Rises; Winter Sleep; X-Men: Days of Future Past; TheZero Theorem

*I cooled on this one considerably after a second viewing.

Monday, July 21, 2014

We Are the Best! & Night Moves Reviews

We Are the Best!
Directed by Lukas Moodysson
Released in 2014

We Are the Best! ends with a riot, as a rowdy audience hurls awful profanities at our three young heroines, Bobo (Mira Barkhammer), Klara (Mira Grosin) and Hedvig (Liv LeMoyne), in the middle of their punk rock set. But it’s undeniably a happy ending, one that literally gives voice to the film’s exclamative title and shrugs off the hostility met by politically charged music to, instead, exalt the joyous highs of friendship.

Best friends Bobo, a reserved tomboy, and Klara, a wild id with a mohawk to prove it, look around their Stockholm middle school and only see conformity, objectification, blondes. They turn to punk music, naturally, and bounce lyrics off one another for their first song, “Hate the Sport,” while walking laps ordered by their gym teacher for not following the rules. Like most coming-of-age fiction, We Are the Best! runs through a lot of boring rules just begging to be broken, but what makes this film not only stomachable but intelligent is how these girls come across as the right mix of precocious and flat-out annoying. They hide behind “the rules” to steal a practice room from a bunch of metalhead jerks (their band is called “Iron Fist”) and shrink from messing with them head-on, but they do so to prove a point. They don’t even know how to play instruments, but now they have a space to learn, dammit. Still, they need to learn, which is when loner Hedvig, a gifted classical guitarist, joins the picture.

At first I thought I was in for a Portrait of the Artist as a Young Girl, times three, that would interrogate the weird drive in these worldly adolescents to make a statement, however on-the-nose it may be, through music. We get a little bit of that, as Hedvig imposes some discipline like “chords” on Klara’s atonal wailing and a maturation becomes visible. But director-writer Lukas Moodysson finds the relationships between these girls more interesting than their amateur music, which is a smart, if also somewhat safe choice. Boys enter the picture, which is at first a cute and necessary (given the boyish looks of these girls, especially Bobo) subplot that lapses into convention before long.

More vibrant is the time these girls — all played phenomenally, perfectly by their respective actresses — spend together. Moodysson's camera has a tungsten-tinged, handheld aesthetic that recalls Lars von Trier, and there is a moment when Bobo accidentally cuts her hand, screaming in pain, and that brutal Nordic realism threatens to surface. But it turns out to be just a flesh wound, quickly bandaged, and Klara and Hedvig flank her for a group hug. “I don’t want to die,” Bobo says. An extreme response, perhaps, but those words were just under the surface, waiting for a rapt audience of two.



Night Moves
Directed by Kelly Reichardt
Released in 2014

Kelly Reichardt is a name anyone who follows American independent film should know, considering she is not only one of the best female directors out there but one of the best, period. But if you have not seen Meek’s Cutoff or Wendy and Lucy, chances are you have heard of Jesse Eisenberg and Dakota Fanning, the stars of her latest film, Night Moves. Along with Peter Sarsgaard, the two play eco-terrorists plotting, in hushed whispers, to blow up a Oregon dam. While Fanning is just fine in her limited role, it is Eisenberg who you will remember. With very little dialogue to work with — Reichardt is known for “slow cinema” — Eisenberg proves that he does not need Aaron Sorkin-penned putdowns to hold your attention; all he needs is a tic, a hunched walk, a cold stare. He is creepy, intense, but above all contained. The obscurity of this movie guarantees he will go unnoticed come Oscar season, which goes to show how useless those awards are in the first place.

As barren and nocturnal the film’s ambience may be, this is also a oddly funny film. Reichardt does a lot of heavy lifting in the editing room, cutting from a grave piece of eco-propaganda to Eisenberg’s stone face once he is finished watching it. Even a man willing to topple infrastructure in the name of the environment knows a piece of brainless fluff when he sees it. The same goes with Reichardt. Her film ends on a willfully opaque note, but its premature conclusion guarantees that Eisenberg’s statuesque update of Psycho’s Norman Bates will stalk the corners of your mind, and maybe vision, for some time to come.